Dar pora dienelių, dar keli paveiksliukai…
Karas, vienok, net ir pavadintas ATO – vis tiek liūdnas dalykas. Bet ir čia galima kai ką linksmo surast?
Dar pora dienelių, dar keli paveiksliukai…
Karas, vienok, net ir pavadintas ATO – vis tiek liūdnas dalykas. Bet ir čia galima kai ką linksmo surast?
Taigi!
(postas tai smarkiai 18+, beveik vien paveiksliukai, gan perkreiptas viena kryptimi, tai žmonėms su nestabilia psichika neskaityti)!
Dar kelios naktinės foto. Parkelis – iš pasakos ;-)
Pasirodo antys naktį nemiega – atėjus prie upės staigiai prisistatė ir paprašė ko nors skanaus ;-)
Skanaus negavo, tai bent jau papozavo šiek tiek…
Ta proga dar ir seniau susuktas video (tik šitas jau dieną, ne naktį):
Gi pagaliau kažkiek pasnigo, tai trūktelėjau kelis vaizdelius (dieną nėra kada, o ir dienos tokios… Apsiniaukę):
Buvom centre apsižvalgyti. Gražiai miestas atrodo, gaila kad buvo labai debesuota….
Pažiūrėjom ir 3D filmukus, kuriuos ten rodė. Tas ant katedros sienos tai labai jau vaikiškas gavosi, bet gal kitamet geriau pavarys…
EDIT: deja, filmukų neliko – nuplaukė kartu su mano YT account…
As allways – for details see video description on YT/Vimeo (all videos are re-uploaded after deletion on YT) :
I had several RF heads – based on AD8317 (and working from PC), also based on AD8313 (you can get entire RF head assembled for ~20$ or so at https://www.sv1afn.com/projects.html) and decided that i need portable box for measuring signal levels and VTX power.
Did that, working well:
it’s actually very simple and entire box costs ~35$ or so (if you have basic parts and attenuators already). Accuracy is acceptable (+/- 1.5dBm in -10 … -40dBm range).
And no, it won’t work better than other tools (even RF explorer is much better with it’s -105dB+ range); it won’t do correct math for frequency (MCU is too weak to do proper calculations). So, if you need serious tool – go look for other solutions. If you need something cheap and working well enough to test antennas/TX/RX – it works good enough.
Few videos from this year FPV meeting:
Already old ;-)
Got one CPATCH12… Looks OK, but pricey – i want to do large phased array, so i measured dimensions and will try to make it on other materials (original material – black FR4, probably requires some modifications if dielectric material changes).
Anyway, pics (with active part visible – i put microcontrast at max), dimensions (active part) and 3D drawing below.
Not exactly comparison, as you can’t see what i see in my screen, but…
If a Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words, Then Video is Priceless!
I’m working on long-range (60km+ one direction, 200km+ total range) FPV plane. Almost entire plane is built from scratch (batteries, airframe, autopilot, antennas) and i’m trying to choose right components.
For 60km+ range i probably can’t go with single antenna – i need array of antennas (other options – LNA (good LNA are very expensive!), more power to VTX (and i need electric power for motor, also – interference), trackers on both sides (too complex and error prone)). Now just need to choose correct polarisation option…
So, my options at this moment – circular polarized array (CP BiCircles – i like circles :P ) or linear polarized array (again, bicircles). Both have high gain (~16dBi for CP array, ~17dBi for LP array), both can be built to be flat (another reason why yagi antenna is out of scope – too big to transport).
Lots of resources on internet about CP/LP choice, in general all agree about:
So, question remains – how much banking is too much for LP, and how much image quality i will loose for using LP? Knowing this, i can choose right antenna array. To answer this question, i did simple test. Conditions:
What i got (distance is top-middle):
OK, my old CP antennas lived trough hell (lots of crashes, repairs, re-soldering, tunning) and probably do not have < 1.5 SWR anymore. But i didn’t expected them to perform so bad, compared to LP…
< 5km range with CP (OK, bit better signal quality compared to LP – less noise, no sudden signal loss), that’s approx 20km total range. 10km range with LP (still good signal when banking – check video) – that’s approx 40km total range without attenuator and in better weather/RF conditions (and really simple antenna construction, Vee’s won’t be destroyed by trees anymore) – i think, we got clear winner here.
Next in work queue – BiCircle antenna array for 60km+ range (and i guess 80km range should be easy too).
Notes:
I’m building long-range plane and was looking for camera with small frontal area. All my FPV cameras are PZ0420 (with or without IR filter, also known as CMQ1993X on sc2k, sold as CC1333 and CC1333-B on surveilzone) – great cameras for FPV, but huge drag on fast plane.
Found this one – HS1149F – acceptable price and small enough. After 2 weeks… :
It’s really small! Even with this metal case it’s much smaller than PZ0420 with broken off edges (bottom left).
Did short test in my living room with two cams: PZ0420 (no IR filter, better light sensitivity, bad colors) and HS1149F. Sorry, no flight videos with new cam – i won’t have time for at least two weeks and weather sucks (CMQ1993X – the same PZ0420 with IR filter video is here). I maybe add video with new cam later…
So, PZ0420 in my living room, pointing straight to light source:
From left to right:
The same image with HS1149F:
From left to right:
In short:
First flights after few weeks, if it’s in-air performance will be great – i will replace my other cams too ;-)
EDIT: short comparison video is here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9vCnUSNJYE